|
MEDICAL
PAYMENTS PER CLAIM FOR MASSACHUSETTS WORKERS’ COMP CLAIMS
LOWEST OF 14 STATES, BUT STEADILY INCREASING, REPORTS NEW
WCRI STUDY
CAMBRIDGE, MA, August 4, 2009
–
Medical payments per workers’ compensation claim
in Massachusetts were the lowest of 14 states, despite
steady increases since 2001, according to a new study from
the Workers Compensation Research Institute (WCRI).
The study, CompScope™ Medical Benchmarks for
Massachusetts, 9th Edition, reported that employers in
Massachusetts paid an average of just over $5,100 for 2006
claims with experience through March 2007.
A key driver of the lower medical payments was the lower
prices paid for nonsurgical services, which were related to
the lowest nonhospital provider fee schedule in the nation,
according to Cambridge, Mass.-based WCRI.
Despite lower-than-typical fee schedule rates for all
service categories including surgery, the study found that
prices paid for surgeries were higher in Massachusetts
compared to other study states. Massachusetts employers and
insurers often negotiated surgery prices higher than what
the fee schedule dictated, particularly for orthopedic
surgeries.
WCRI observed that recent regulations in the form of fee
schedule changes that became effective April 1, 2009,
focused on this issue. Fees for many surgical procedures
were increased to reflect current rates being paid, raising
fees in some cases two to three times above the 2004 fee
schedule rates.
Another provision of the revised fee schedule increased
physician fees by 10 to 20 percent, except for anesthesia
and surgery, which were the subject of larger increases. At
the same time, hospital reimbursement rates were generally
decreased.
The study found that medical payments per claim in
Massachusetts were lower for nearly all providers—both
nonhospital and hospital—compared to the typical study
state.
For example, payments to physicians were 42 percent lower
than the median of the 14 states, mainly due to fewer
physician visits and fewer services per visit. Utilization
for nonhospital providers in Massachusetts was the lowest
among the study states.
In addition, fewer claims received specialty services, such
as minor radiology and physical medicine from nonhospital
providers. Conversely, these services (and evaluation and
management) were provided more often in a hospital
outpatient setting in Massachusetts than in the typical
study state.
Payments per claim for hospital outpatient services in
Massachusetts were about half the amount paid in the typical
study state. The lower payments per claim for hospital
outpatient services may be partially due to the fact that a
higher percentage of general outpatient care was billed by
hospitals in Massachusetts compared to other study states,
services that would likely be billed as nonhospital services
in other states. As a result, the mix of services provided
in the hospital outpatient setting was less intense in
Massachusetts than in the typical study state.
The lower payments per service for hospital outpatient
services are likely due to the fact that the provider fee
schedule applies to hospital outpatient services when it is
determined that the service can be safely provided outside
the hospital setting. Hospital inpatient payments per claim
were lower than typical of the study states, and a lower
percentage of cases involved an inpatient stay.
The study also found that medical payments per claim in
Massachusetts have been steadily increasing—9 to 12 percent
per year from 2001 to 2005 and at a slightly slower rate, 7
percent, in 2006 for claims with 12 months of experience.
In 2006, payments per claim to nonhospital providers were
stable or falling, due mainly to fewer visits per claim;
prices paid were stable. The payments per claim for hospital
outpatient services had moderate growth since 2004, mainly
driven by increases in payments per service for hospital
outpatient services.
The Workers Compensation Research Institute is a
nonpartisan, not-for-profit membership organization
conducting public policy research on workers’ compensation,
health care and disability issues. Its members include
employers, insurers, and governmental entities, insurance
regulators and state administrative agencies, as well as
several state labor organizations. |