|
CALIFORNIA MULTI-YEAR WORKERS’ COMPENSATION REFORMS SHOW
IMPACT ON SYSTEM COSTS, WCRI STUDY REPORTS
CAMBRIDGE, MA, March 21, 2008
–
California continued to experience the largest decrease in
average workers’ compensation costs per claim among 14 study
states in 2005/2006, similar to the prior year (2004/2005),
after years of double-digit cost growth and in the wake of
reforms enacted in 2002 through 2004.
Workers’ compensation costs per claim in
California dropped by 15 percent in 2005/2006 (2005 claims
evaluated in 2006), driven by rapid decreases in both
medical costs per claim (14 percent) and indemnity benefits
per claim with more than seven days of lost time (8 percent).
California’s proportion of claims with more
than seven days of lost time fell by 2-3 percentage points
annually in the two latest years in the study, after several
years of small increases. These decreases were larger than
in any other study state during the same period.
Medical costs per claim with more than seven
days of lost time dropped 10 percent in 2005/2006 following
a 22 percent decrease in 2004/2005, a 4 percent increase in
2003/2004, and double-digit growth in earlier years of the
study period.
These were among the findings of a new study
by the Workers Compensation Research Institute (WCRI), which
examined evidence of the impact of multi-year workers’
compensation reforms in California.
The WCRI study, Monitoring 2002-2004
Reforms in California: CompScope™ Benchmarks, 8th
Edition, provides a baseline for evaluating the impact
of the reforms enacted in 2002 through 2004 and evidence of
the impact of certain reforms up through the first quarter
of 2006.
Other states included in the study were
Arkansas, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Louisiana, Maryland,
Massachusetts, Michigan, North Carolina, Pennsylvania,
Tennessee, Texas and Wisconsin.
The major legislative provisions included:
increasing the maximum statutory weekly benefits for
temporary and permanent disability; repeal of the treating
physician presumption of correctness; revisions in the
medical fee schedule for physician services; setting
inpatient hospital fees and outpatient surgery facility fees
to 120 percent of Medicare fees; setting pharmaceutical
prices to 100 percent of Medi-Cal prices; limiting the
number of visits to chiropractors and physical therapists to
24; requiring the use of utilization guidelines; the
replacement of vocational rehabilitation benefits with the
Supplemental Job Displacement Benefit; revision of the
permanent disability schedule; and the approval of Medical
Provider Networks.
WCRI reported that several factors
contributed to the 8 percent decrease in indemnity
benefits—payments for lost wages—per claim with more than
seven days of lost time in 2005/2006. This included a 9
percent (or 1.5 week) drop in the duration of temporary
disability, a 6 point decrease in the frequency of permanent
partial disability (PPD)/lump-sum claims, and a decline of
more than 14 percent in the average PPD/lump-sum payment per
claim. These decreases in PPD/lump-sum frequency and
payments per claim were the largest ones among all states in
the study period.
WCRI noted that these decreases may reflect
some early impact of the revised permanent disability
schedule and other relevant provisions under SB 899, most of
which were effective January 1, 2005. However, additional
years of data are needed to see the full impact of the
reforms.
WCRI reported that expenses per claim for
delivering medical and indemnity benefits to injured workers
remained stable in the two latest years, following three
years of double-digit growth. Medical cost containment
expenses per claim changed little in 2004/2005 and increased
6 percent in 2005/2006—less than half of the growth rates in
the earlier three years in the study period.
The
Workers Compensation Research Institute is a nonpartisan,
not-for-profit membership organization conducting public
policy research on workers’ compensation, healthcare and
disability issues. Its members include employers, insurers,
insurance regulators and state administrative agencies in
the U.S., Canada, Australia and New Zealand as well as
several state labor organizations. |