|
WORKERS’ COMPENSATION
COSTS PER CLAIM IN ILLINOIS
HIGHER THAN MOST STATES EXAMINED IN NEW WCRI STUDY
Chicago, IL, March 7, 2003
– Workers’
compensation costs per claim in
Illinois
were among the highest of the states analyzed in a new study
and continuing to rise, according to the Workers
Compensation Research Institute (WCRI).
The
study of 12 states, representing 50 percent of the
nation’s workers’ compensation benefits paid, reported
that higher payments for the medical care of injured workers
and a larger proportion of claims with more than seven days
of time away from the job were key reasons why costs per
claim in Illinois
ranked
higher than other states.
Workers’
compensation costs per claim in Illinois also continued to
grow rapidly, increasing 10 percent between 1998 and1999
(evaluated as of mid-2000), at about the same rate than the
11 percent growth experienced between 1997 and 1998,
according to the Cambridge, Mass.-based WCRI.
Increases
in medical payments per claim were cited as the strongest
and most consistent factor behind the ongoing rise in
overall costs per claim, up an average of 10 percent per
year from 1997 to1999. The
study noted that Illinois is one of
four states among the 12 states studied that does not have a
medical fee schedule to control costs.
The
study, CompScope™
Benchmarks: Multistate Comparisons, 1994-2000, provides
a meaningful comparison of the workers’ compensation
systems in 12 large states on key performance measures. The other states included in the study were California, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia,
Indiana, Massachusetts, North
Carolina, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Texas
and Wisconsin.
The
study found that workers’ compensation claim costs in
Illinois
averaged
$3,376 per claim in 2000, 30 percent above the median of the
12 study states. Medical
payments per claim were the major cost driver – 43 percent
above the median.
Illinois
also had a
slightly higher percentage of claims with more than seven
days of lost time, 22 percent versus the 12 state median of
20 percent.
Claims
for the more serious injuries, called permanent partial
disabilities (PPD), and lump-sum settlements, occurred more
frequently in Illinois. More than one-half (53 percent) of claims with more
than seven days of lost time were PPD/lump-sum claims and 35
percent had lump-sum settlements (1997 claims at an average
36 months’ experience).
“Policymakers
should take a close look at the factors behind higher claim
costs in
Illinois,” said
Dr. Richard Victor, executive director of WCRI.
“Medical costs per claim were high and continued to
rise,” he observed. “The absence of a medical fee
schedule also is cause for further study.”
The
study reported that medical payments per claim were a major
cost driver. At
an average of $2,015 per claim in 1999 of mid-2000, medical
payments per claim in
Illinois
were 43
percent above the median of the 12 study states, second only
to Texas.
Indemnity
benefits – wage replacement payments to injured workers
– averaged $1,065 per claim for 1999 claims (evaluated as
of mid-2000), 11 percent higher than the 12-state median.
The
study also pointed out that Illinois had lower to typical
benefit delivery expenses – medical cost containment
expenses, defense attorney payments, medical-legal expenses,
and other litigation-related expenses – compared with the
other states studied.
This
result occurred largely because medical cost containment
expenses per claim and defense attorney payments per claim
were lower than typical of the states in the study.
However,
litigiousness in Illinois, as
measured by the percentage of claims with defense attorney
involvement, was among the highest of the study states.
Payments to defense attorneys were made in 41 percent
of 1997 claims (36 months’ experience), nearly 20
percentage points higher than the 12-state median.
The
Workers Compensation Research Institute is a nonpartisan,
not-for-profit membership organization conducting public
policy research on workers’ compensation, healthcare and
disability issues. Its members include employers, insurers,
insurance regulators and state regulatory agencies in the U.S., Canada, Australia
and New Zealand
as well as
several state labor organizations.
|