|
WISCONSIN
WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COSTS PER CLAIM LOWER,
BUT MODEST GROWTH
CONTINUED, SAYS NEW WCRI STUDY
State May Be Missing Opportunities to Control Medical Costs
Milwaukee, WI, March 6, 2003
– Although the
average cost of a workers’ compensation claim in Wisconsin
was lower
than most states, average cost per claim continued to grow
moderately, according to a new study by the Workers
Compensation Research Institute (WCRI).
The
study of 12 states representing 50 percent of the nation’s
workers’ compensation benefits paid also found that the
less intense use of medical cost containment services in
Wisconsin may be related to higher than expected medical
payments per claim made for the treatment of injured
workers.
This
finding suggests that there may be opportunities to reduce
medical costs per claim with broader adoption of medical
cost containment initiatives, the study observed.
Lower
workers’ compensation costs per claim in the state were
driven by shorter duration of temporary disability, lower
indemnity benefits per claim – wage replacement payments
for lost-time injuries – and fewer and less costly claims
for permanent partial disabilities (PPD) and lump-sum
settlements.
Costs
per claim for a similar set of claims were lower in Wisconsin
than in
most of the 12 study states. At an average of $2,182, total costs per all paid
claims in
Wisconsin
were about
half the average in Texas, the state
with the highest total costs per paid claims.
The
study, CompScope™
Benchmarks: Multistate
Comparisons, 1994-2000, provides a meaningful comparison
of the workers’ compensation systems in 12 large states on
key performance measures. In addition to Wisconsin, the other
states in the study conducted by the Cambridge, Mass.-based
WCRI were California, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Illinois,
Indiana, Massachusetts, North
Carolina, Pennsylvania, Tennessee
and Texas.
The
study noted that costs per claim in Wisconsin
grew 6
percent from 1998 to 1999 (evaluated as of mid-2000), about
the same rate of moderate growth – averaging over five
percent per year – between 1995 and 1998.
Indemnity
benefits per claim rose 4.5 percent, medical payments per
claim grew 6 percent and benefit delivery expenses per claim
increased 12 percent in 1999 as of mid-2000, according to
the study. Growth in temporary disability duration drove the
increase in indemnity benefits per claim.
The
study pointed out that given Wisconsin’s lower
claim costs overall, medical payments per claim were higher
than expected – $1,462 versus the 12-state median of
$1,406. At the
same time, medical cost containment services, such as bill
and utilization reviews, case management, and preferred
provider fees, were used with less intensity than in other
states.
“Public
policymakers in Wisconsin
should
keep a close eye on rising workers’ compensation costs per
claim,” said Dr. Richard Victor, executive director of
WCRI. “In particular, the state may be missing an
opportunity to control its higher than expected medical
costs by not utilizing medical cost containment services,”
he said.
For
example, the study reported that Wisconsin claims had lower
expenses for medical cost containment services than in any
other study state – $460 per claim, less than half the
amount for the median of the 12 states ($958) for 1999
claims with more than seven days of lost time (evaluated as
of mid-2000).
Rather
than a traditional fee schedule, Wisconsin
has relied
on certified databases that list formula amounts for medical
reimbursement.
Wisconsin
also does
not use treatment guidelines and uses utilization reviews in
a more limited way than other study states. While managed
care is permitted, it is not regulated by the workers’
compensation agency.
The
Workers Compensation Research Institute is a nonpartisan,
not-for-profit membership organization conducting public
policy research on workers’ compensation, health care and
disability issues. Its members include employers, insurers,
insurance regulators and state regulatory agencies in the U.S., Canada, Australia
and New Zealand
as well as
several state labor organizations.
|